Walden v. Walden
157 So. 3d 1100, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3334, 2015 WL 1003944
This text of 157 So. 3d 1100 (Walden v. Walden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Walden v. Walden, 157 So. 3d 1100, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3334, 2015 WL 1003944 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Welden, 483 So.2d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (“[W]here the moving party’s allegations raise a colorable entitlement to rule 1.540(b)(3) relief, a formal evidentiary hearing on the motion, as well as permissible discovery prior to the hearing, is required.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. v. Welden
483 So. 2d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
157 So. 3d 1100, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3334, 2015 WL 1003944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walden-v-walden-fladistctapp-2015.