Walden v. Walden
157 So. 3d 1100, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3334, 2015 WL 1003944
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Welden, 483 So.2d 487, 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (“[W]here the moving party’s allegations raise a colorable entitlement to rule 1.540(b)(3) relief, a formal evidentiary hearing on the motion, as well as permissible discovery prior to the hearing, is required.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walden v. Walden, 157 So. 3d 1100, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 3334, 2015 WL 1003944 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
157 So. 3d 1100 (Walden v. Walden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. v. Welden
483 So. 2d 487 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)