Walden v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Walden v. State

115 S.E. 280, 29 Ga. App. 387, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 20

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 11, 1923

Docket14063

StatusPublished

This text of 115 S.E. 280 (Walden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walden v. State, 115 S.E. 280, 29 Ga. App. 387, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 20 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains the usual general grounds only. The evidence relied upon for a conviction, while circumstantial, is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contains the usual general grounds only. The evidence relied upon for a conviction, while circumstantial, is sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant’s guilt, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 S.E. 280, 29 Ga. App. 387, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 20, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walden-v-state-gactapp-1923.