Walden v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit

180 So. 3d 246, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19352, 2015 WL 9459970
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 2015·No. No. ID15-4095·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on Castellanos v. Next Door Co., 124 So.3d 392 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Castello[247]*247nos. Id. at 394. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981).

ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walden v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit, 180 So. 3d 246, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 19352, 2015 WL 9459970 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

180 So. 3d 246 (Walden v. Hillsborough Area Regional Transit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jollie v. State
405 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Castellanos v. Next Door Co.
124 So. 3d 392 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)