Walden Leasing, Inc. v. Modicamore

559 So. 2d 656, 1990 WL 29586
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 1990
Docket89-3185
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 559 So. 2d 656 (Walden Leasing, Inc. v. Modicamore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walden Leasing, Inc. v. Modicamore, 559 So. 2d 656, 1990 WL 29586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

559 So.2d 656 (1990)

WALDEN LEASING, INC., Snappy Car Rental, Inc., and Vickie L. Shane, Appellants,
v.
Dominic MODICAMORE and Catherine Modicamore, Individually and As Personal Representatives of the Estate of Anthony Modicamore, Deceased, Appellees.

No. 89-3185.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

March 21, 1990.
Rehearing and Stay Denied May 17, 1990.

*657 Geoffrey B. Marks of Walton Lantaff Schroeder & Carson, Miami, for appellants.

Michael J. Carbo of Ferrero, Middlebrooks, Strickland & Fischer, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellants-defendants appeal an order denying a motion to change venue from Broward County to Palm Beach County. We reverse.

The defendants argue that the action should have been transferred to Palm Beach County because the individual defendant resides in Palm Beach County and one of the corporate defendants has an office in Palm Beach County. Although an action against multiple defendants residing in different counties may be brought in any county in which any defendant resides, an exception has been carved out where a corporate defendant resides in the same county as the individual defendant. In such event, venue is only proper in the county of the joint residency. Inter-Medic Health Centers, Inc. v. Murphy, 400 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). Therefore, the trial court here erred in failing to grant the motion to transfer the action to Palm Beach County.

Despite the foregoing authority, the plaintiff relies on Berdos v. Dowling, 544 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). That case is inapplicable here since the parties in Berdos were not requesting a transfer to the county where there was joint residency. Moreover, Berdos concerned the sufficiency of affidavits. Thus, Berdos is not dispositive on the matter now before this court.

Accordingly, we reverse the order denying the transfer of venue.

REVERSED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A-Ryan Staffing Solutions Inc. v. Ace Staffing Management Unlimited, Inc.
917 So. 2d 1000 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
International Fidelity Insurance Co. v. Simmons
670 So. 2d 1123 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Spears v. Harvey
632 So. 2d 290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Sinclair Fund, Inc. v. Burton
623 So. 2d 587 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Powell v. Dover Properties, Inc.
605 So. 2d 185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
559 So. 2d 656, 1990 WL 29586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walden-leasing-inc-v-modicamore-fladistctapp-1990.