Wald v. Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc.

236 A.D. 836

Opinion

Order so far as appealed from by the plaintiff reversed, with costs to the plaintiff against the defendants Sachs' Quality Furniture, Inc., and William Sacks, and the verdict reinstated in the sum of $1,500 against the defendants

[837]*837Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc., and William Sacks. Order so far as appealed from by defendant Joseph A. Manning reversed, with costs to said defendant against the plaintiff, and the verdict in his favor reinstated. (See Polsey v. Waldorf Astoria, Inc., 216 App. Div. 86; Farber v. Demino, 254 N. Y. 363; O’Shea v. Kirker, 8 Abb. Pr. 69.) Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, O’Malley, Sherman and Townley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wald v. Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc., 236 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

236 A.D. 836 (Wald v. Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farber v. Demino
173 N.E. 223 (New York Court of Appeals, 1930)
Polsey v. Waldorf-Astoria, Inc.
216 A.D. 86 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
O'Shea v. Kirker
8 Abb. Pr. 69 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)