Wald v. Crisp

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Wald v. Crisp

1977 OK CR 243, 568 P.2d 316, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 698

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 16, 1977

DocketNo. O-77-545

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1977 OK CR 243 (Wald v. Crisp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wald v. Crisp, 1977 OK CR 243, 568 P.2d 316, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 698 (Okla. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

For the reason above set forth, we find the present application for Writ of Mandamus to be prematurely filed. We further observe that in the event the petitioner asserts in a future application that he is entitled to immediate relief, if credits are granted, he should set forth with specificity the time and dates these credits were earned and cite the authority under which he claims these credits. For the purpose of an application for a Writ of Mandamus to correct time computations, any petition filed in excess of 60 days prior to the claimed date of release will be deemed to be prematurely filed.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be, and the same is, hereby, DISMISSED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 16th day of August, 1977.

Hez J. Bussey, P. J.

Tom Brett, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the reason above set forth, we find the present application for Writ of Mandamus to be prematurely filed. We further observe that in the event the petitioner asserts in a future application that he is entitled to immediate relief, if credits are granted, he should set forth with specificity the time and dates these credits were earned and cite the authority under which he claims these credits. For the purpose of an application for a Writ of Mandamus to correct time computations, any petition filed in excess of 60 days prior to the claimed date of release will be deemed to be prematurely filed.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be, and the same is, hereby, DISMISSED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 16th day of August, 1977.

Hez J. Bussey, P. J.

Tom Brett, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1977 OK CR 243, 568 P.2d 316, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wald-v-crisp-oklacrimapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack