Wald v. Crisp

1977 OK CR 243, 568 P.2d 316, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 698
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 16, 1977·No. No. O-77-545·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

For the reason above set forth, we find the present application for Writ of Mandamus to be prematurely filed. We further observe that in the event the petitioner asserts in a future application that he is entitled to immediate relief, if credits are granted, he should set forth with specificity the time and dates these credits were earned and cite the authority under which he claims these credits. For the purpose of an application for a Writ of Mandamus to correct time computations, any petition filed in excess of 60 days prior to the claimed date of release will be deemed to be prematurely filed.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that the Petition for Writ of Mandamus should be, and the same is, hereby, DISMISSED.

WITNESS OUR HANDS, and the Seal of this Court, this 16th day of August, 1977.

Hez J. Bussey, P. J.

Tom Brett, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wald v. Crisp, 1977 OK CR 243, 568 P.2d 316, 1977 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 698 (Okla. Ct. App. 1977).

1977 OK CR 243 (Wald v. Crisp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scales v. Walters
1995 OK CIV APP 119 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1995)
Waldon v. Evans
1993 OK CR 46 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1993)