Walczak v. Walczak

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walczak v. Walczak

151 So. 3d 551, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19780, 2014 WL 6834844

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 5, 2014

DocketNo. 5D13-2227

StatusPublished

This text of 151 So. 3d 551 (Walczak v. Walczak) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walczak v. Walczak, 151 So. 3d 551, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19780, 2014 WL 6834844 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on the numerous errors contained in the final judgment concerning equitable distribution, many of which are admitted by the appellee, Charles Walczak, we reverse that part of the final judgment and remand the case to the trial court to redetermine the equitable distribution plan in this case. Once the new equitable distribution plan is determined, the trial court will then have to decide whether the issues of alimony and attorney’s fees will have to be readdressed. Accordingly, we also reverse that part of the final judgment awarding alimony and attorney’s fees. We remand to the trial court for further pro-ceedmgs. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Based on the numerous errors contained in the final judgment concerning equitable distribution, many of which are admitted by the appellee, Charles Walczak, we reverse that part of the final judgment and remand the case to the trial court to redetermine the equitable distribution plan in this case. Once the new equitable distribution plan is determined, the trial court will then have to decide whether the issues of alimony and attorney’s fees will have to be readdressed. Accordingly, we also reverse that part of the final judgment awarding alimony and attorney’s fees. We remand to the trial court for further pro-ceedmgs. In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

TORPY, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 So. 3d 551, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 19780, 2014 WL 6834844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walczak-v-walczak-fladistctapp-2014.