Walczak v. State

77 A.D.2d 787, 430 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 10, 1980
DocketClaim No. 60750
StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.2d 787 (Walczak v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walczak v. State, 77 A.D.2d 787, 430 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Claimants appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims which awarded them $4,560 plus interest for the taking by the State of approximately 774 square feet of land from a parcel consisting of 19,006 square feet [788]*788located on Harlem Road in the Town of Cheektowaga. There is no real dispute in the land value involved in this partial taking but there is an arithmetic error which requires correction. Claimants’ appraiser valued the land appropriated at 85 cents per square foot and to that figure added $200 for blacktop inprovements lost in the taking. The State’s appraiser valued the land at 62lá cents per square foot to which he added $400 for the blacktop improvement loss which in his opinion resulted in direct damages of $865. The court adopted claimants’ per square foot figure for direct damages which totaled $660 but neglected to make an award for the lost blacktop, a loss which both appraisers conceded was compensable, differing only in the amount of the loss. Because the court accepted claimants’ figures on the square foot value on the land appropriated, we conclude that the blacktop omission was a simple oversight and, consistent with the court’s acceptance of claimants’ other valuation on this particular phase of the taking, we modify the award by adding $200 to the court’s award of $660 making the resultant direct damages $860, and, as modified, affirm the judgment. Plaintiffs appeal from the award of consequential damages is without merit and that portion of the award is affirmed. (City of Yonkers v State of New York, 40 NY2d 408.) (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims —appropriation.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons,. Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Yonkers v. State
353 N.E.2d 829 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A.D.2d 787, 430 N.Y.S.2d 725, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walczak-v-state-nyappdiv-1980.