Walburn v. Dunlap

879 N.E.2d 782, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1473
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 23, 2008·No. 2007-2302·Published

Opinion

Vinton App. No. 06CA655, 2007~Ohio-5398. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Entry filed December 3, 2007:

“In a case involving multiple claims, is a judgment in the declaratory judgment action a final appealable order when the trial court finds that an insured is entitled to coverage, includes a Civ.R. 54(B) certification, but does not address the issue of damages?”

Lanzinger and Cupp, JJ., dissent.

The conflict cases are Baheshtaein v. Am. State Ins. Co., Montgomery App. No. 20839, 2005-Ohio-5907, Tinker v. Oldaker, Franklin App. Nos. 03AP-671 and 03AP-1036, 2004-Ohio-3316, and Walter v. Allstate Ins. Co., Summit App. No. 21032, 2002-Ohio-5775.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-2150, Walburn v. Dunlap, Vinton App. No. 06CA655, 2007-Ohio-5398.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walburn v. Dunlap, 879 N.E.2d 782, 116 Ohio St. 3d 1473 (Ohio 2008).

879 N.E.2d 782 (Walburn v. Dunlap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walburn v. Dunlap, Unpublished Decision (10-2-2007)
2007 Ohio 5398 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Tinker v. Oldaker, Unpublished Decision (6-24-2004)
2004 Ohio 3316 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)