Walbridge v. Bell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Walbridge v. Bell

4 Walk. 354

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 16, 1885·No. No. 46·Published

Opinion

The Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Common Pleas on February 16th, 1885, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

There is no merit in any of the specifications of error. Under the facts, the claim for the exemption was made in time; Howard, &c., Association vs. Philadelphia & Reading R. R. Co., 6 Out., 220. Being intime, judgment against the garnishee was correctly refused.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court affirmed the decree of the Common Pleas on February 16th, 1885, in the following opinion:

Per Curiam.

There is no merit in any of the specifications of error. Under the facts, the claim for the exemption was made in time; Howard, &c., Association vs. Philadelphia & Reading R. R. Co., 6 Out., 220. Being intime, judgment against the garnishee was correctly refused.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.

Walbridge v. Bell, 4 Walk. 354 (Pa. 1885).

Pincite

4 Walk. 354 (Walbridge v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.