Walborsky v. Walborsky

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walborsky v. Walborsky

197 So. 2d 853, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5158

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 13, 1967·No. No. H-487·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Evelyne Walborsky has appealed from a divorce decree. We have carefully considered all the points on appeal and find that Appellant has failed to clearly show that the chancellor made any error save with respect to the sufficiency of the award for support of the four minor children. Although the record is vague as to the sum which will be sufficient to maintain the children, it does show that the Ap-pellee’s annual income is substantial and that the children have attained a high standard of living primarily from this income. We have observed that the record leaves the impression that Appellant’s father is wealthy and she has some separate [854]*854property, but the primary responsibility for child support rests upon the husband.

The cause is remanded for the purpose of taking further testimony as to the necessaries for the children and for an adequate award for same. Otherwise the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Evelyne Walborsky has appealed from a divorce decree. We have carefully considered all the points on appeal and find that Appellant has failed to clearly show that the chancellor made any error save with respect to the sufficiency of the award for support of the four minor children. Although the record is vague as to the sum which will be sufficient to maintain the children, it does show that the Ap-pellee’s annual income is substantial and that the children have attained a high standard of living primarily from this income. We have observed that the record leaves the impression that Appellant’s father is wealthy and she has some separate [854]*854property, but the primary responsibility for child support rests upon the husband.

The cause is remanded for the purpose of taking further testimony as to the necessaries for the children and for an adequate award for same. Otherwise the decree is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Walborsky v. Walborsky, 197 So. 2d 853, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5158 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

197 So. 2d 853 (Walborsky v. Walborsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related