Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros.

Supreme Court

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros.

145 L. Ed. 2d 35, 120 S. Ct. 308, 528 U.S. 808, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6583, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8208, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10411, 68 U.S.L.W. 3233

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 4, 1999

DocketNo. 99-150

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 145 L. Ed. 2d 35 (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., 145 L. Ed. 2d 35, 120 S. Ct. 308, 528 U.S. 808, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6583, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8208, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10411, 68 U.S.L.W. 3233 (U.S. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question:- “What must be shown to establish that a product’s design is inherently distinctive for purposes of Lanham Act trade-dress protection?” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 18, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Mon[809]*809day, December 20, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 10,2000. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question:- “What must be shown to establish that a product’s design is inherently distinctive for purposes of Lanham Act trade-dress protection?” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 18, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Mon[809]*809day, December 20, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 10,2000. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 L. Ed. 2d 35, 120 S. Ct. 308, 528 U.S. 808, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6583, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8208, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10411, 68 U.S.L.W. 3233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wal-mart-stores-inc-v-samara-bros-scotus-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack