Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros.

145 L. Ed. 2d 35, 120 S. Ct. 308, 528 U.S. 808, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6583, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8208, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10411, 68 U.S.L.W. 3233
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 4, 1999·No. No. 99-150·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to the following question:- “What must be shown to establish that a product’s design is inherently distinctive for purposes of Lanham Act trade-dress protection?” Brief of petitioner is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Thursday, November 18, 1999. Brief of respondent is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Mon[809]*809day, December 20, 1999. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, January 10,2000. This Court’s Rule 29.2 does not apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., 145 L. Ed. 2d 35, 120 S. Ct. 308, 528 U.S. 808, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 6583, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8208, 99 Daily Journal DAR 10411, 68 U.S.L.W. 3233 (U.S. 1999).

145 L. Ed. 2d 35 (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

James v. Tilghman
194 F.R.D. 408 (D. Connecticut, 1999)