Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rosa Maria Gonzalez and Anastacio Gonzalez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2002
Docket13-01-00189-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rosa Maria Gonzalez and Anastacio Gonzalez (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rosa Maria Gonzalez and Anastacio Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rosa Maria Gonzalez and Anastacio Gonzalez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                   NUMBER 13-01-189-CV

                             COURT OF APPEALS

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,          Appellant,

                                                   v.

ROSA MARIA GONZALEZ, ET AL.,                                         Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

                        On appeal from the 206th  District Court

                                  of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

                                   O P I N I O N

           Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yanez and Rodriguez

                                                Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, WAL-MART STORES, INC., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-907-00-D.  After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was submitted to the Court, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that this case has been resolved and appellee has executed a release of judgment.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of September, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Rosa Maria Gonzalez and Anastacio Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wal-mart-stores-inc-v-rosa-maria-gonzalez-and-anas-texapp-2002.