Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance

250 F. App'x 221
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2007·No. No. 05-35772·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[222] MEMORANDUM**

Wal-Mart Stores, Ine., appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Gulf Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters, Members and Insurers at Lloyd’s of London, and Employers Insurance Company of Wausau (collectively “Insurers”). The district court held that an exclusionary clause of the insurance policies in question precluded Wal-Mart from collecting insurance proceeds from the Insurers. We affirm.

Under the law of the State of Oregon, which governs here,1 the provisions that excluded coverage for “making good defective design or specifications, faulty material, or faulty workmanship” unambiguously2 precluded Wal-Mart from recovering for repairs to the very items (concrete slabs) that were defective due to the claimed defective specifications. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Smith, 929 F.2d 447, 449-50 (9th Cir.1991); see also Allianz Ins. Co. v. Impero, 654 F.Supp. 16, 17-18 (E.D.Wash.1986).3

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance, 250 F. App'x 221 (9th Cir. 2007).

250 F. App'x 221 (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Gulf Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

12W RPO, LLC v. Affiliated FM Ins. Co.
353 F. Supp. 3d 1039 (D. Oregon, 2018)