Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. Dominga De Luna

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2002
Docket13-00-00764-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. Dominga De Luna (Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. Dominga De Luna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. Dominga De Luna, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

                                    NUMBER 13-00-00764-CV

                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                 THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                   CORPUS CHRISTI B EDINBURG

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,                                                                        Appellant,

                                                                             v.

DOMINGA DE LUNA,                                                                                               Appellee.

                     On Appellant=s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Settlement.

                                     O P I N IO N

             Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Rodriguez

                                                             Opinion Per Curiam

This cause was submitted to this Court on January 23, 2002, on oral argument, the record, and briefs.  On December 3, 2002, appellant filed an unopposed motion to:  (1) dismiss the present appeal pursuant to settlement, and (2) remand this cause to the trial court to allow the trial court to vacate its judgment and dismiss all claims between the parties with prejudice.


The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal and remand to the trial court, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.  The appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.  The appeal is dismissed and the cause is remanded to the trial court to allow the trial court to vacate its judgment and dismiss all claims between the parties with prejudice.

                        Per Curiam

Do not publish.  Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed this the

19th day of December, 2002.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v. Dominga De Luna, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wal-mart-stores-inc-v-dominga-de-luna-texapp-2002.