Wal-Kar Manufacturing Co. v. Mosca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wal-Kar Manufacturing Co. v. Mosca

17 A.D.2d 993, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6939

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 26, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 993 (Wal-Kar Manufacturing Co. v. Mosca) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wal-Kar Manufacturing Co. v. Mosca, 17 A.D.2d 993, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6939 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for a stay of all proceedings in the action, pending appeal from two orders, granted on condition: (1) that appellant perfect and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the February Term, beginning January 28, 1963; and (2) that, within 10 days after entry of the order hereon, appellant shall serve and file an undertaking, with corporate surety, to pay the judgment, the interest thereon and costs in the event that the orders be affirmed in whole or in part or that the appeal therefrom be dismissed. Such undertaking shall be in an amount sufficient to pay the judgment (the amount of which is not disclosed in the moving or opposing papers), the interest and costs. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said February Term; appellant is directed to serve and file the record and his brief on or before January 4, 1963. Cross motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal from the two orders, denied, with leave to renew on the argument of the appeal. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for a stay of all proceedings in the action, pending appeal from two orders, granted on condition: (1) that appellant perfect and be ready to argue or submit the appeal at the February Term, beginning January 28, 1963; and (2) that, within 10 days after entry of the order hereon, appellant shall serve and file an undertaking, with corporate surety, to pay the judgment, the interest thereon and costs in the event that the orders be affirmed in whole or in part or that the appeal therefrom be dismissed. Such undertaking shall be in an amount sufficient to pay the judgment (the amount of which is not disclosed in the moving or opposing papers), the interest and costs. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said February Term; appellant is directed to serve and file the record and his brief on or before January 4, 1963. Cross motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal from the two orders, denied, with leave to renew on the argument of the appeal. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 993, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wal-kar-manufacturing-co-v-mosca-nyappdiv-1962.