Wakeman v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.

5 N.E.2d 363, 272 N.Y. 625, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1116
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 24, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Crouch, J., taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wakeman v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co., 5 N.E.2d 363, 272 N.Y. 625, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1116 (N.Y. 1936).

5 N.E.2d 363 (Wakeman v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brodsky v. City of New York
9 Misc. 2d 187 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)