Wakeman v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.
5 N.E.2d 363, 272 N.Y. 625, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1116
This text of 5 N.E.2d 363 (Wakeman v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wakeman v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Rd. Co., 5 N.E.2d 363, 272 N.Y. 625, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1116 (N.Y. 1936).
Opinion
Judgment of the Appellate Division reversed and that of the Trial Term affirmed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division, on the ground that the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. No opinion.
Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Htjbbs, Loughran and Finch, JJ.; Crouch, J., taking no part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brodsky v. City of New York
9 Misc. 2d 187 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 N.E.2d 363, 272 N.Y. 625, 1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wakeman-v-new-york-new-haven-and-hartford-rd-co-ny-1936.