Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. v. United States

42 Cust. Ct. 439

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 31, 1958

DocketReap. Dec. 9287; Entry No. 3767

StatusPublished

This text of 42 Cust. Ct. 439 (Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wakem & McLaughlin, Inc. v. United States, 42 Cust. Ct. 439 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain so-called “Musketeer” glass bottles that were exported from France and entered at the port of Chicago, Ill.

[440]*440Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the “Musketeer” bottles in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such dutiable value for the merchandise is $6 per case, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain so-called “Musketeer” glass bottles that were exported from France and entered at the port of Chicago, Ill.

[440]*440Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the “Musketeer” bottles in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such dutiable value for the merchandise is $6 per case, and I so hold. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 Cust. Ct. 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wakem-mclaughlin-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1958.