Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia

675 F. App'x 357

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2017·No. No. 16-7329·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Wakefield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Wakefield appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Va., No. 1:16-cv-00666-AJT-JFA (E.D. Va. Aug. 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia, 675 F. App'x 357 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 357 (Wakefield v. Circuit Court of Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related