Waked v. Feghali

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Waked v. Feghali

56 So. 3d 44, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2011 WL 148276

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 2011

Docket3D10-1937

StatusPublished

This text of 56 So. 3d 44 (Waked v. Feghali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waked v. Feghali, 56 So. 3d 44, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2011 WL 148276 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

The Appellant, Melvina Fouad Abou Waked, defendant below, seeks to reverse a non-final order denying her motion for summary judgment against her husband, Jean Ibrahim Feghali. We dismiss the appeal because the order from which this appeal is taken is not an appealable non-final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(c). See, e.g., Vaneo Constr. v. Nucor, 378 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (holding that an order denying a motion for summary judgment is not an appealable non-final order pursu *45 ant to rule 9.130). 1

Dismissed.

1

. We recommend that the lower court address the issue of subject matter jurisdiction before proceeding further in this case to determine interest in real property allegedly acquired during the marriage between two foreign nationals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUAREZ, J.

The Appellant, Melvina Fouad Abou Waked, defendant below, seeks to reverse a non-final order denying her motion for summary judgment against her husband, Jean Ibrahim Feghali. We dismiss the appeal because the order from which this appeal is taken is not an appealable non-final order pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(c). See, e.g., Vaneo Constr. v. Nucor, 378 So.2d 116 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) (holding that an order denying a motion for summary judgment is not an appealable non-final order pursu *45 ant to rule 9.130). 1

Dismissed.

1

. We recommend that the lower court address the issue of subject matter jurisdiction before proceeding further in this case to determine interest in real property allegedly acquired during the marriage between two foreign nationals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 So. 3d 44, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 198, 2011 WL 148276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waked-v-feghali-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack