Wake v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wake v. State

68 Ga. App. 802

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 28, 1943·No. 29928·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Fulton County of operating a lottery, known as the “number game,” the judge presiding without a jury. The evidence amply authorized the judgment. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari, which assigned error only upon the ground that the defendant’s conviction was unauthorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted in the criminal court of Fulton County of operating a lottery, known as the “number game,” the judge presiding without a jury. The evidence amply authorized the judgment. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari, which assigned error only upon the ground that the defendant’s conviction was unauthorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Wake v. State, 68 Ga. App. 802 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

68 Ga. App. 802 (Wake v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.