Wake v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n

860 S.W.2d 295, 1993 Ky. LEXIS 107, 1993 WL 332822
CourtKentucky Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 2, 1993
DocketNo. 93-SC-612-KB
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 860 S.W.2d 295 (Wake v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Kentucky Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wake v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n, 860 S.W.2d 295, 1993 Ky. LEXIS 107, 1993 WL 332822 (Ky. 1993).

Opinion

OPINION AND ORDER

A. Norrie Wake of Lexington was found guilty of mail fraud, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341; misappropriation of funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 666 and conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The charges arise from a scheme where employees of the Fayette County Attorney’s office were given excessive pay raises and these funds were then channeled back to pay Wake’s accumulated campaign debt in his campaign for Fay-ette County Attorney. Such criminal conduct as established by the convictions violates SCR 3.130(8.3).

Wake now seeks to resign his license to practice law under terms of disbarment. His convictions are of such a nature as to put in grave issue his moral fitness to continue the practice of law. KBA v. Cline, Ky., 814 S.W.2d 925 (1991). The Kentucky Bar Association has indicated that the motion to resign his license is acceptable.

Therefore, it is ordered that A. Norrie Wake’s motion to resign from the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky and the Kentucky Bar Association is granted. It is further ordered that:

1. Wake shall not be permitted to engage in the practice of law in the Commonwealth of Kentucky until such time as the Supreme Court of Kentucky enters an order reinstating his membership in the Kentucky Bar Association.

2. Wake shall not file an application for reinstatement for a period of five years from September 2, 1993.

3. Any application for reinstatement shall be governed by SCR 3.520, or any subse[296]*296quent amendment thereto regarding reinstatement in case of disbarment.

4. All disciplinary proceedings against Wake shall be terminated and the costs thereof shall be paid by Wake in accordance with SCR 3.450(1) and SCR 3.480(3) in the sum of $7.70.

5. Pursuant to SCR 3.390, Wake is hereby ordered to provide notice to any clients he is currently representing of his inability to provide further legal services, to notify all courts in which he has matters pending of his resignation under terms of disbarment, and to provide the Director of the Kentucky Bar Association with a copy of all such letters.

All concur, except STEPHENS, C.J., not sitting.

ENTERED September 2, 1993.

/s/ Charles M. Leibson Acting Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Wake
36 S.W.3d 760 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 2001)
Zeman v. Kentucky Bar Ass'n
867 S.W.2d 189 (Kentucky Supreme Court, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 S.W.2d 295, 1993 Ky. LEXIS 107, 1993 WL 332822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wake-v-kentucky-bar-assn-ky-1993.