Wake v. Hart

12 How. Pr. 444
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 How. Pr. 444 (Wake v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wake v. Hart, 12 How. Pr. 444 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1855).

Opinion

Cowles, Justice.

The foreclosure sale, in this case, was regular in all respects, although the paper in which the notice of sale was published was not well calculated to give that general information which in such cases should have been afforded. But there is nothing to impeach the title of the purchaser, while there would be great difficulty in devising a mode by which he could be indemnified in case the sale were now set aside. In order to insure, as a general rule, good prices under foreclosure sales, the sales should not be set aside except for good and substantial reasons. Otherwise, purchasers at such sales would be deterred from bidding.

Eor these reasons, and as no party now offers to take the premises at an advanced price upon the original bid, the motion to set aside the sale must be denied, but without costs to either party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brush v. Shuster
3 Abb. N. Cas. 73 (New York Supreme Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 How. Pr. 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wake-v-hart-nysupct-1855.