Wake County Human Services v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Wake County Human Services v. Davis

626 F. App'x 57

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2015·No. Nos. 15-1968, 15-1969, 15-1970, 15-1971, 15-1972, 15-7355·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidatéd appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions for recusal and to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wake Cty. Human Servs. v. Davis, No. 5:14-cv-00005-F (E.D.N.C. July 14, 2015); id. (Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidatéd appeals, William Scott Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions for recusal and to reopen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wake Cty. Human Servs. v. Davis, No. 5:14-cv-00005-F (E.D.N.C. July 14, 2015); id. (Aug. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wake County Human Services v. Davis, 626 F. App'x 57 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

626 F. App'x 57 (Wake County Human Services v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.