Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000)

Connecticut Superior Court

Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077

Connecticut Superior Court·Decided July 3, 2000·No. No. CV00 0070257S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION (#103) On June 27, 2000, the court heard reargument on the defendant's motion for exclusive possession of the premises located at 36 Oakcrest Road, Oxford, Connecticut. The defendant is proceeding under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-83. Section 46b-83 applies in the event of a dissolution of marriage, legal separation and annulment. As the parties in the present case were never married, § 46b-83 is inapplicable. The defendant's motion for exclusive possession is denied.

The Court

By Curran, J. CT Page 9078

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION (#103) On June 27, 2000, the court heard reargument on the defendant's motion for exclusive possession of the premises located at 36 Oakcrest Road, Oxford, Connecticut. The defendant is proceeding under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-83. Section 46b-83 applies in the event of a dissolution of marriage, legal separation and annulment. As the parties in the present case were never married, § 46b-83 is inapplicable. The defendant's motion for exclusive possession is denied.

The Court

By Curran, J. CT Page 9078

Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077 (Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related