Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000)

2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedJuly 3, 2000
DocketNo. CV00 0070257S
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077 (Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wajdowicz v. Far, No. Cv00 0070257s (Jul. 3, 2000), 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: MOTION FOR EXCLUSIVE POSSESSION (#103)
On June 27, 2000, the court heard reargument on the defendant's motion for exclusive possession of the premises located at 36 Oakcrest Road, Oxford, Connecticut. The defendant is proceeding under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-83. Section 46b-83 applies in the event of a dissolution of marriage, legal separation and annulment. As the parties in the present case were never married, § 46b-83 is inapplicable. The defendant's motion for exclusive possession is denied.

The Court

By Curran, J. CT Page 9078

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 46b-83
Connecticut § 46b-83

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wajdowicz-v-far-no-cv00-0070257s-jul-3-2000-connsuperct-2000.