Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown

205 A.D.2d 615, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6202

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter Patsalos, J.), dated November 25, 1992, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case that the defendant created the condition which caused the accident or that it had actual or constructive notice of that condition (see, Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 64 NY2d 670, affg 99 AD2d 246; Payne v Big V [616]*616Supermarkets, 140 AD2d 422). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown, 205 A.D.2d 615, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 615 (Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
474 N.E.2d 612 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
99 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Payne v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.
140 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)