Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown

205 A.D.2d 615, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6202

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 615 (Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waizenegger v. Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks Lodge 1097 of Middletown, 205 A.D.2d 615, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter Patsalos, J.), dated November 25, 1992, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case that the defendant created the condition which caused the accident or that it had actual or constructive notice of that condition (see, Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 64 NY2d 670, affg 99 AD2d 246; Payne v Big V [616]*616Supermarkets, 140 AD2d 422). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Peter Patsalos, J.), dated November 25, 1992, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case that the defendant created the condition which caused the accident or that it had actual or constructive notice of that condition (see, Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 64 NY2d 670, affg 99 AD2d 246; Payne v Big V [616]*616Supermarkets, 140 AD2d 422). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 615, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waizenegger-v-benevolent-protective-order-of-elks-lodge-1097-of-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack