Waits v. State
This text of 46 S.W.3d 888 (Waits v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The opinion of the Court was delivered
A jury convicted Appellant of possession of a controlled substance, a state-jail felony. The jury also found the enhancement allegations to be true and assessed punishment at confinement for fifteen years. The Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Waits v. State, 9 S.W.3d 904 (Tex. [889]*889App.—Fort Worth 2000). The Court of Appeals concluded that V.T.C.A. Penal Code, § 12.42(a)(2) permits two sequential prior felony convictions, one of which is a state-jail felony conviction, to enhance a non-aggravated state-jail felony to a second-degree felony. Appellant filed this petition for discretionary review challenging the use of the state-jail felony conviction for enhancement under the language of § 12.42(a)(2), which specifies that felonies may be used, but does not state that state-jail felonies may be used.
In Campbell v. State, (Tex.Crim.App. No.2031-99, delivered March 7, 2001), this Court held that the terms “felony” and “state-jail felony” as used in § 12.42(a) are mutually exclusive. At the time the Court of Appeals decided this case, it did not have the benefit of this Court’s opinion in Campbell. Accordingly, we grant ground one of Appellant’s petition for discretionary review and remand the case to the Court of Appeals in fight of our opinion in Campbell.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
46 S.W.3d 888, 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 38, 2001 WL 540757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waits-v-state-texcrimapp-2001.