Waite v. Waite
180 P. 941, 180 Cal. 238, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 471
Opinion
[1] The respondent herein confesses error, and asks that the interlocutory judgment appealed from be reversed for the reason set forth in appellant's opening brief.
The point made for reversal in the appellant's opening brief appears to be well based and requires a reversal. The plaintiff should be allowed to amend her complaint in the lower court.
The judgment appealed from is reversed.
Shaw, J., Olney, J., Wilbur, J., Lawlor, J., Melvin, J., Lennon, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred. *Page 239
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waite v. Waite, 180 P. 941, 180 Cal. 238, 1919 Cal. LEXIS 471 (Cal. 1919).
180 P. 941 (Waite v. Waite) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Layton v. United States
78 F.2d 499 (Eighth Circuit, 1935)