Waite v. Hewitt

451 So. 2d 528, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13581
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 12, 1984·No. No. 84-487·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment taxing costs, namely, the fees of an accountant appointed by the court as a special master, upon a holding that such costs were taxed against the appellant, Waite, in derogation of his constitutionally guaranteed opportunity to be heard upon proper notice and without the submission of evidence in support thereof. See Neimark v. Abramson, 403 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Posner v. Flink, 393 So.2d 1140 (Fla.3d DCA 1981).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waite v. Hewitt, 451 So. 2d 528, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13581 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

451 So. 2d 528 (Waite v. Hewitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Carnoto
837 So. 2d 1127 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Staff v. Trafalgar Developers of Florida, Inc.
518 So. 2d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)