Wait v. Van Demark

2 N.Y.S. 265, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 137
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 24, 1888·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The order of Judge Bockes, denying the motion to vacate the order of reference, was not appealed from, and therefore stands as the law of the case. So standing, it follows that the order appealed from must be affirmed, with $10 costs, and printing disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wait v. Van Demark, 2 N.Y.S. 265, 1888 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 137 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).

2 N.Y.S. 265 (Wait v. Van Demark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Holland
12 Mills Surr. 461 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1914)