Wait v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
This text of 173 A.D. 979 (Wait v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff’s exception to the dismissal of the complaint is sustained and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event, upon the ground that upon the evidence it was a question of fact for the jury whether or not the Aveak condition of poles Hos. 1, 2 and 3, due to defendant’s negligence in maintaining them, was a proximate cause of their fall. Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
173 A.D. 979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wait-v-postal-telegraph-cable-co-nyappdiv-1916.