Wait & Bartlett Manufacturing Co. v. Morton

33 Misc. 783, 67 N.Y.S. 1149
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1901
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Misc. 783 (Wait & Bartlett Manufacturing Co. v. Morton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wait & Bartlett Manufacturing Co. v. Morton, 33 Misc. 783, 67 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1901).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment shows that the learned justice believed the defendant’s evidence that there had not been an account stated. As the record fails to disclose that he was in error in doing so, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Present: Truax, P. J., Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Misc. 783, 67 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wait-bartlett-manufacturing-co-v-morton-nyappterm-1901.