Waisikoski v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.
178 A.D. 932
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Waisikoski v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 173 A.D. 538 →
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred; Mills, J., dissented upon the ground that jurisdiction is absolutely imposed upon the court by section 1780 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and, therefore, the court had no discretion to decline to exercise it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waisikoski v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 178 A.D. 932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).
178 A.D. 932 (Waisikoski v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.