Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village
This text of Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village (Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-16-0000011 27-MAY-2016 08:12 AM
SCWC-16-0000011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
RAEVYN WAIKIKI,
Respondent/Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant-Appellee,
vs.
HO'OMAKA VILLAGE ASSOCIATION OF APARTMENT OWNERS,
Respondent/Defendant-Cross-Claim Plaintiff-Appellee,
and
VIOLET JHUN,
Petitioner/Defendant-Cross-Claim Defendant-Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
WADE KIOSHI KALEOLANI SHIMOJO,
Respondent/Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-16-0000011; CIV. NO. 13-1-2391-09)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner Violet Jhun’s application for writ of
certiorari, filed on April 14, 2016, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be
heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant
to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, May 27, 2016.
Walter R. Schoettle /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
for petitioner Violet Jhun
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Richard Turbin, Rai Saint
Chu, and Janice D. Heidt /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
for respondent Wade Kioshi /s/ Richard W. Pollack
Kaleolani Shimojo
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Waikiki v. Ho'omaka Village, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waikiki-v-hoomaka-village-haw-2016.