Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Waikem v. Cleveland Clinic Pound

Waikem v. Cleveland Clinic Pound

986 N.E.2d 30, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1413
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 24, 2013
Docket2013-0065
StatusPublished

This text of 986 N.E.2d 30 (Waikem v. Cleveland Clinic Pound) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waikem v. Cleveland Clinic Pound, 986 N.E.2d 30, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Stark App. No. 2011 CA 00234, 2012-Ohio-5620.

O’Connor, C.J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Lanzinger, J., dissents and would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II. O’Neill, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waikem v. Cleveland Clinic Found.
2012 Ohio 5620 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
986 N.E.2d 30, 135 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waikem-v-cleveland-clinic-pound-ohio-2013.