Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC

M.D. Florida

Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC

DecidedAugust 3, 2020

Docket2:20-cv-00162

StatusUnknown

This text of Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC (Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

KATIE WAIDMANN, an individual

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-162-FtM-38MRM

ADVANCED RADIOLOGY IMAGING ASSOCIATES, LLC, MI MEDICAL SPA, LLC and SAURIN J. SHAH,

Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER1 Before the Court are the parties’ Notice of Settlement (Doc. 35) and Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 36). Katie Waidmann sued Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC, MI Medical Spa, LLC, and Saurin J. Shah under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for unpaid overtime and for five common law tort claims. (Doc. 1). The parties now inform the Court they have resolved Waidmann’s FLSA claim without compromise and with attorney fees and costs negotiated and paid separately. Therefore, there is no need for the Court to review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Mackenzie v. Kindred Hosps. East, L.L.C., 276 F. Supp. 2d 1211, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2003). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an

1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. action voluntarily by filing a stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared, as Waidmann has done here. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 3rd day of August, 2020.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

KATIE WAIDMANN, an individual

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-162-FtM-38MRM

ADVANCED RADIOLOGY IMAGING ASSOCIATES, LLC, MI MEDICAL SPA, LLC and SAURIN J. SHAH,

Defendants. / OPINION AND ORDER1 Before the Court are the parties’ Notice of Settlement (Doc. 35) and Joint Stipulation for Dismissal (Doc. 36). Katie Waidmann sued Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC, MI Medical Spa, LLC, and Saurin J. Shah under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for unpaid overtime and for five common law tort claims. (Doc. 1). The parties now inform the Court they have resolved Waidmann’s FLSA claim without compromise and with attorney fees and costs negotiated and paid separately. Therefore, there is no need for the Court to review and approve the settlement for fairness. See Lynn’s Food Stores, Inc. v. U.S. Dep’t of Labor, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352 (11th Cir. 1982); see also Mackenzie v. Kindred Hosps. East, L.L.C., 276 F. Supp. 2d 1211, 1217 (M.D. Fla. 2003). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows a plaintiff to dismiss an

1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. action voluntarily by filing a stipulation signed by all parties who have appeared, as Waidmann has done here. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: 1. The case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly, terminate all pending motions and deadlines, and close the file. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida this 3rd day of August, 2020.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Waidmann v. Advanced Radiology Imaging Associates, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waidmann-v-advanced-radiology-imaging-associates-llc-flmd-2020.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack