Waible v. Dosberg

83 A.D.2d 983
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 26, 1981·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent Dosberg appeals from an order of the Erie Special Term granting the petition to invalidate his designating petitions on the ground that the additions made to previously subscribed witness statements (including those in which respondent himself was the subscribing witness) violate section 6-132 of the Election Law as interpreted in Matter of Sheldon v Sperber (45 NY2d 788). Special Term erred. Matter of Sheldon v Sperber applies only to additions made to previously subscribed witness statements by “another in the witness’ absence” (supra, p 789), and not to additions made to one’s own statement. We find the other objections raised to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court, Ostrowski, J. — election law.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

(Decided Aug. 26, 1981.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waible v. Dosberg, 83 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

83 A.D.2d 983 (Waible v. Dosberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baum v. County of Rockland
337 F. Supp. 2d 454 (S.D. New York, 2004)
MATTER OF GRANCIO v. Coveney
454 N.E.2d 535 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)