Waible v. Dosberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Waible v. Dosberg

83 A.D.2d 983

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 26, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 83 A.D.2d 983 (Waible v. Dosberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waible v. Dosberg, 83 A.D.2d 983 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent Dosberg appeals from an order of the Erie Special Term granting the petition to invalidate his designating petitions on the ground that the additions made to previously subscribed witness statements (including those in which respondent himself was the subscribing witness) violate section 6-132 of the Election Law as interpreted in Matter of Sheldon v Sperber (45 NY2d 788). Special Term erred. Matter of Sheldon v Sperber applies only to additions made to previously subscribed witness statements by “another in the witness’ absence” (supra, p 789), and not to additions made to one’s own statement. We find the other objections raised to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court, Ostrowski, J. — election law.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

(Decided Aug. 26, 1981.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Respondent Dosberg appeals from an order of the Erie Special Term granting the petition to invalidate his designating petitions on the ground that the additions made to previously subscribed witness statements (including those in which respondent himself was the subscribing witness) violate section 6-132 of the Election Law as interpreted in Matter of Sheldon v Sperber (45 NY2d 788). Special Term erred. Matter of Sheldon v Sperber applies only to additions made to previously subscribed witness statements by “another in the witness’ absence” (supra, p 789), and not to additions made to one’s own statement. We find the other objections raised to be without merit. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court, Ostrowski, J. — election law.) Present — Dillon, P.J., Cardamone, Callahan, Denman and Schnepp, JJ.

(Decided Aug. 26, 1981.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 A.D.2d 983, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waible-v-dosberg-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack