Home/New York Court of Appeals/Waible v. Dosberg

Waible v. Dosberg

427 N.E.2d 507, 54 N.Y.2d 780, 443 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2686
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 3, 1981
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 427 N.E.2d 507 (Waible v. Dosberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waible v. Dosberg, 427 N.E.2d 507, 54 N.Y.2d 780, 443 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2686 (N.Y. 1981).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated by that court. In addition we would note that there was no finding of permeation. The sheets to which the appellant himself acted as the subscribing witness, containing 393 signatures, give the appellant more than the required signatures necessary to place him on the primary ballot.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Waghtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baum v. County of Rockland
337 F. Supp. 2d 454 (S.D. New York, 2004)
MATTER OF GRANCIO v. Coveney
454 N.E.2d 535 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
427 N.E.2d 507, 54 N.Y.2d 780, 443 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waible-v-dosberg-ny-1981.