Wai Yee Woo v. Pav-Co Asphalt, Inc.
This text of 240 A.D.2d 729 (Wai Yee Woo v. Pav-Co Asphalt, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an ac[730]*730tion to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Pav-Co Asphalt, Inc. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCaffrey, J.), dated July 26, 1996, as denied its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the cross motion of the defendant Pav-Co Asphalt, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it inasmuch as the record discloses issues of fact which preclude the granting of such relief (see, Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557; Museums at Stony Brook v Village of Patchogue Fire Dept., 146 AD2d 572). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, O’Brien and Ritter, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D.2d 729, 660 N.Y.S.2d 999, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wai-yee-woo-v-pav-co-asphalt-inc-nyappdiv-1997.