Wahler v. Thompson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wahler v. Thompson

26 A.D.2d 895, 274 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 20, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 895 (Wahler v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wahler v. Thompson, 26 A.D.2d 895, 274 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Doris Reynolds unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted as to defendant Doris Reynolds, and otherwise judgment and order affirmed, without costs of these appeals to any party. Memorandum: The judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Doris Reynolds is against the weight of the credible evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term in favor of plaintiffs in an automobile negligence action; also appeal by defendant Kenneth Reynolds from order denying his motion to vacate service of summons and complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Doris Reynolds unanimously reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted as to defendant Doris Reynolds, and otherwise judgment and order affirmed, without costs of these appeals to any party. Memorandum: The judgment in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Doris Reynolds is against the weight of the credible evidence. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Trial Term in favor of plaintiffs in an automobile negligence action; also appeal by defendant Kenneth Reynolds from order denying his motion to vacate service of summons and complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 895, 274 N.Y.S.2d 862, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wahler-v-thompson-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack