Wahl v. State
This text of 559 So. 2d 240 (Wahl v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant Peter G. Wahl was convicted of escape (circuit court case no. 83-106F). The offense occurred on or about December 28, 1982. On August 7, 1984, Wahl affirmatively elected to be sentenced under the guidelines. The trial court sentenced him to a departure sentence of ten years, less than the statutory maximum of fifteen years permitted for a second degree felony. His conviction was affirmed on appeal. Wahl v. State, 472 So.2d 1194 (1985).
Wahl filed a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied his motion, and he timely appeals contending that we should vacate his sentence and direct that he be resentenced since the October 15,1983 guidelines were found to be unconstitutional. Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989).
We reject Wahl’s contention. He elected guidelines sentencing, and was so sentenced, after the sentencing guidelines had been validly enacted by the legislature.1 The ruling in Smith does not affect Wahl because Wahl’s election took place after July 1, 1984. See Connell v. State, 538 So.2d 854, at 855 n. * (Fla.1989).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 So. 2d 240, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1440, 1990 WL 21419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wahl-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.