Wahl v. Seyfried

260 A.D. 993, 25 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5722
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the findings that the contract alleged in the complaint was made are contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (See Tracy v. Danzinger, 253 App. Div. 418; affd., 279 N. Y. 679.) (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to compel specific performance of an agreement.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wahl v. Seyfried, 260 A.D. 993, 25 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

260 A.D. 993 (Wahl v. Seyfried) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Estate of Buehler
186 Misc. 306 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1945)