Wahl v. Seyfried

260 A.D. 993, 25 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5722
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 20, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 260 A.D. 993 (Wahl v. Seyfried) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wahl v. Seyfried, 260 A.D. 993, 25 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5722 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the findings that the contract alleged in the complaint was made are contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (See Tracy v. Danzinger, 253 App. Div. 418; affd., 279 N. Y. 679.) (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to compel specific performance of an agreement.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Estate of Buehler
186 Misc. 306 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 993, 25 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wahl-v-seyfried-nyappdiv-1940.