Wahl v. Jackson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wahl v. Jackson

276 A.D.2d 797, 715 N.Y.S.2d 160, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10970

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 276 A.D.2d 797 (Wahl v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wahl v. Jackson, 276 A.D.2d 797, 715 N.Y.S.2d 160, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10970 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel dismissal of ticket number OA57862420, charging the petitioner with speeding, on the ground that the complainant officer failed to provide a supporting deposition pursuant to CPL 100.25 (2), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated January 4, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, and the stay of proceedings relating to the prosecution of ticket number OA57862420 is vacated forthwith.

The procedural requirements of CPL 100.25 (2) are inapplicable to the prosecution by the Traffic Violations Division of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the petitioner for speeding (see, Matter of Miller v Schwartz, 128 AD2d 783, affd 72 NY2d 869; Matter of Sulli v Appeals Bd., 55 AD2d 457). The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Rosenthal v Hartnett, 36 NY2d 269, 274). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel dismissal of ticket number OA57862420, charging the petitioner with speeding, on the ground that the complainant officer failed to provide a supporting deposition pursuant to CPL 100.25 (2), the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated January 4, 2000, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs, and the stay of proceedings relating to the prosecution of ticket number OA57862420 is vacated forthwith.

The procedural requirements of CPL 100.25 (2) are inapplicable to the prosecution by the Traffic Violations Division of the Department of Motor Vehicles of the petitioner for speeding (see, Matter of Miller v Schwartz, 128 AD2d 783, affd 72 NY2d 869; Matter of Sulli v Appeals Bd., 55 AD2d 457). The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, Matter of Rosenthal v Hartnett, 36 NY2d 269, 274). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Goldstein and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

276 A.D.2d 797, 715 N.Y.S.2d 160, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wahl-v-jackson-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack