Wahl v. Cronin
This text of 163 A.D. 908 (Wahl v. Cronin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. The verdict of the jury as to the condition of the stairway, and prior notice thereof to the janitor of the building, is supported by testimony the credibility of which was for the jury. In view of plaintiff’s injuries and the reduction of the verdict directed by the trial justice, it cannot be held that the judgment is excessive or unreasonable. Present—Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A.D. 908, 147 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wahl-v-cronin-nyappdiv-1914.