Wagy v. Maass

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Wagy v. Maass

829 P.2d 1057, 113 Or. App. 150, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 928

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 13, 1992

Docket89C-10617; CA A66483

StatusPublished

This text of 829 P.2d 1057 (Wagy v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagy v. Maass, 829 P.2d 1057, 113 Or. App. 150, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 928 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of failure to appear in the first degree, ORS 162.205, and was placed on probation for five years. Subsequently, his probation was revoked, and he was sentenced to a prison term of three years. He appealed the judgment revoking his probation. Meanwhile, he had filed this proceeding for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his original conviction. The court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the petition was premature under ORS 138.540(1), because petitioner had “an appeal pending on the same matter. ’ ’ The state concedes that the pendency of petitioner’s appeal from the revocation of his probation does not preclude his filing a petition for post-conviction relief from his original conviction.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner was convicted of failure to appear in the first degree, ORS 162.205, and was placed on probation for five years. Subsequently, his probation was revoked, and he was sentenced to a prison term of three years. He appealed the judgment revoking his probation. Meanwhile, he had filed this proceeding for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with his original conviction. The court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the petition was premature under ORS 138.540(1), because petitioner had “an appeal pending on the same matter. ’ ’ The state concedes that the pendency of petitioner’s appeal from the revocation of his probation does not preclude his filing a petition for post-conviction relief from his original conviction.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

829 P.2d 1057, 113 Or. App. 150, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagy-v-maass-orctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack