Wagstaff v. City of Durham

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 6, 2003
• Docket: 03-1012
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1012

CHRISTOPHER D. WAGSTAFF,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF DURHAM,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-01-615-1)

Submitted: July 15, 2003 Decided: August 6, 2003

Before WILKINSON, WIDENER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Everett Robinson, ROBINSON LAW OFFICE, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellant. Joel M. Craig, KENNON, CRAVER, BELO, CRAIG & MCKEE, P.L.L.C., Durham, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Wagstaff appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to Defendant in this Title VII action

alleging race discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the

materials before us and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wagstaff

v. City of Durham, No. CA-01-615-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 25, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED