Wagstaff v. City of Durham

70 F. App'x 725
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2003·No. No. 03-1012·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher D. Wagstaff appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this Title VII action alleging race discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the materials before us and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wagstaff v. City of Durham, 233 F.Supp.2d 739 (M.D.N.C.2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wagstaff v. City of Durham, 70 F. App'x 725 (4th Cir. 2003).

70 F. App'x 725 (Wagstaff v. City of Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Call v. Cordova
E.D. Virginia, 2021
Newby v. Whitman
340 F. Supp. 2d 637 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)