Wagstaff Realty Corp. v. Flacke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wagstaff Realty Corp. v. Flacke

94 A.D.2d 704, 461 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18135

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 2, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 704 (Wagstaff Realty Corp. v. Flacke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagstaff Realty Corp. v. Flacke, 94 A.D.2d 704, 461 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18135 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, dated April 29, 1982, which found that petitioner had violated a condition of a dredging permit and assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. Based upon a reading of the entire record, we find that the determination under review is supported by substantial evidence and accordingly, it is confirmed (see Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant the annulment of the determination. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, dated April 29, 1982, which found that petitioner had violated a condition of a dredging permit and assessed a civil penalty in the amount of $1,000. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with costs. Based upon a reading of the entire record, we find that the determination under review is supported by substantial evidence and accordingly, it is confirmed (see Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions and find that they do not warrant the annulment of the determination. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Rubin and Boyers, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 704, 461 N.Y.S.2d 736, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagstaff-realty-corp-v-flacke-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack