Wagoner v. Gerbl

Ohio Supreme Court

Wagoner v. Gerbl

783 N.E.2d 899, 98 Ohio St. 3d 290

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 5, 2003

DocketNo. 2002-1661

StatusPublished

This text of 783 N.E.2d 899 (Wagoner v. Gerbl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagoner v. Gerbl, 783 N.E.2d 899, 98 Ohio St. 3d 290 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of Kimble v. Kimble, 97 Ohio St.3d 424, 2002-Ohio-6667, 780 N.E.2d 273.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is allowed.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court on the authority of Kimble v. Kimble, 97 Ohio St.3d 424, 2002-Ohio-6667, 780 N.E.2d 273.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

783 N.E.2d 899, 98 Ohio St. 3d 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagoner-v-gerbl-ohio-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack