Wagoner Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board

424 F.2d 628, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9703
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 20, 1970
Docket19808
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 424 F.2d 628 (Wagoner Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagoner Transportation Company v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 F.2d 628, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9703 (6th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Wagoner Transportation Company, seeks to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board which the Board seeks to enforce. The order is reported at 177 N.L.R.B. No. 22.

The Board found that the Company discharged employees, Puckett and Burns because they participated in protected union activity in violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act. It also found that other employees were threatened by the Company in violation of Section 8(a) (1) of the Act.

The collective bargaining agreement contained a no-strike clause but provided that an employee could not be discharged for participating in an unauthorized work stoppage unless the strike continued for more than 24 hours. The Board found the wildcat strike in which Burns participated did not last for 24 hours and, therefore, he should not have been *629 discharged. This finding is supported by substantial evidence.

The Company bases its discharge of Puckett, who was a union steward, on his alleged taking of strike action in violation of the bargaining agreement. Puckett opposed the strike at all times and there is substantial evidence to support the finding of the Board on this issue.

There is also substantial evidence on the record as a whole supporting the Board’s finding that the Company did threaten its employees with discharge if they engaged in protected activities.

Enforcement of the order of the Board is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 F.2d 628, 74 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2047, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagoner-transportation-company-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1970.