Wagner v. Watts
Opinion
gave the instruction as prayed, and further instructed, the jury, that the plaintiff could not recover for any part of the stock of goods which was acquired by Bichards subsequently to the date of the first mortgage, whether such additions to the original stock of goods consisted of goods bought with the proceeds of the sales of the said original stock, or of goods exchanged for the same as aforesaid.
The plaintiff took a bill of exceptions, but no writ of error.
Verdict for defendant.
But see 2 Eq. Ca. Ab. 479, 480, and Bucknal et al. v. Roiston,. Prec. in Chan. 285.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
28 F. Cas. 1336 (Wagner v. Watts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.