Wagner v. Watts

28 F. Cas. 1336, 2 D.C. 169, 2 Cranch 169
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedJune 15, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 28 F. Cas. 1336 (Wagner v. Watts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagner v. Watts, 28 F. Cas. 1336, 2 D.C. 169, 2 Cranch 169 (circtddc 1819).

Opinion

The CouRT

gave the instruction as prayed, and further instructed, the jury, that the plaintiff could not recover for any part of the stock of goods which was acquired by Bichards subsequently to the date of the first mortgage, whether such additions to the original stock of goods consisted of goods bought with the proceeds of the sales of the said original stock, or of goods exchanged for the same as aforesaid.

The plaintiff took a bill of exceptions, but no writ of error.

Verdict for defendant.

But see 2 Eq. Ca. Ab. 479, 480, and Bucknal et al. v. Roiston,. Prec. in Chan. 285.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wheeldin v. Wheeler
373 U.S. 647 (Supreme Court, 1963)
German Ins. Co. v. City of Manning
78 F. 900 (U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 1897)
Belknap v. Schild
161 U.S. 10 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Ruggles v. Collier
43 Mo. 353 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1869)
Rogers v. Burlington
70 U.S. 654 (Supreme Court, 1866)
McCracken v. City of San Francisco
16 Cal. 591 (California Supreme Court, 1860)
Stamford Bank v. Ferris
17 Conn. 259 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1845)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 F. Cas. 1336, 2 D.C. 169, 2 Cranch 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-watts-circtddc-1819.