Wagner v. Watts
This text of 28 F. Cas. 1336 (Wagner v. Watts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
gave the instruction as prayed, and further instructed, the jury, that the plaintiff could not recover for any part of the stock of goods which was acquired by Bichards subsequently to the date of the first mortgage, whether such additions to the original stock of goods consisted of goods bought with the proceeds of the sales of the said original stock, or of goods exchanged for the same as aforesaid.
The plaintiff took a bill of exceptions, but no writ of error.
Verdict for defendant.
But see 2 Eq. Ca. Ab. 479, 480, and Bucknal et al. v. Roiston,. Prec. in Chan. 285.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 F. Cas. 1336, 2 D.C. 169, 2 Cranch 169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-watts-circtddc-1819.